Students who worked forHazelwood East High School’s student newspaper sued the school districtafter the principal objected to and removed two articles: one on teen pregnancyand another on divorce. The Fraser ruling upheld a decision school administrators made to punish astudent for a speech delivered at a school assembly that was deemed vulgar andoffensive, and the Hazelwood ruling permitted schools to impose greaterrestrictions on some school-sponsored media. In addition to the Tinker reference, theboard proposed adding references to other U.S. The second part says that students have the right to “expressthemselves unless such expression threatens immediate harm to the welfare of theschool or community.” Des Moines as precedent for studentmedia. The first part of the section cites the standard established inthe 1969 Supreme Court case Tinker v. On March 1, a week before a scheduled vote on revising education coderegulations, the Pennsylvania State Board of Education withdrew the proposedchanges to section 12.9-the free expression section. Students and advisers in Pennsylvaniatemporarily fought off an effort to have their press freedoms limited by theHouse Education Committee, who earlier this year planned to alter the wording inthe “Freedom of Expression” section of the state educationcode. Manyadministrators have argued that their actions to censor are justified, based onthe standard set by the 1988 Supreme Court case, Hazelwood School District v.Kuhlmeier, which limited student free expression rights in some studentpublications. As a growing number of high school students find themselves facing legalbattles regarding censorship, legislators are trying to establish or changeexisting laws regarding student expression and student press rights.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |